ROLE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY IN MOTIVATING UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS TOWARDS A LEARNING TASK IN PUBLIC SECTOR UNIVERSITIES OF RAWALPINDI CITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14308/ite000670Keywords:
ICT, Motivation, Motivational features of ICTAbstract
Over the past few years, information and communication technology has become constantly used in the education especially in the schools, colleges and universities. At the age of globalization technology has its impact upon almost all aspects of life. The purpose of this paper is to explore the role of information and communication technology (ICT) in the motivating University students. The main objectives of the study were to assess motivational features of information and communication technologies as perceived by students. The independent variable of the study was ICT and dependent variable was student’s motivation. Questionnaire was used in the study to collect data. The type of research was survey descriptive research. The sample size of 340 undergraduate students was selected through simple random sampling. Descriptive statistics mean, standard deviation, frequency and percentage were used in the study. Inferential statistics i.e., chi square test was employed for statistical analysis of the data through SPSS. The findings of the study show that ICT effects students’ motivation and improves their learning; knowledge retention and understanding. ICT can solve the problems of the students and motivates students.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
References
<uk>
1. Baş, G. (2012). Reading attitudes of high school students: an analysis from different variables. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their implications, 3(2),47-58.
2. Becker, H. (2000). Pedagogical motivations for pupil computer use that lead to student engagement. Educational Technology, 40 (5), pp.5-17.
3. Christensson, P. (2010, January 4). ICT Definition. Retrieved from http://techterms.com.
4. Crook, C. (2011). Versions of computer supported collaborating in higher education. Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices, 156-171.
5. Heemskerk, I., Volman, M., Admiraal, W., & ten Dam, G. (2012). Inclusiveness of ICT in secondary education: students’ appreciation of ICT tools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(2), 155-170.
6. Jung, I. (2005). ICT-Pedagogy Integration in Teacher Training: Application Cases Worldwide. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (2), 94-101.
7. Kirkwood, A. (2014). Teaching and learning with technology in higher education: blended and distance education needs ‘joined-up thinking’rather than technological determinism. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(3), 206-221.
8. Kok, A. (2007). ICT Integration into Classrooms: Unpublished literature review.
9. Kukkonen, J. E., Kärkkäinen, S., Dillon,P., &Keinonen, T. (2013). The effects of scaffolded simulation-based inquiry learning on fifth-Graders' representations of the Greenhouse effect. International Journal of Science Education. Retrieved SEP. 10, 2012，from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.782452
10. Miller, M. (2009). What the Science of Cognition Tells Us About Instructional Technology. Change, 41(2), 16-17. Retrieved from Research Library.
11. OECS. (2002). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Learning Outcomes in Mathematics and Language Arts for Lower Secondary School Students in the Eastern Caribbean. OECS Education Reform Unit. Retrieved from http://www.oecs.org/oeru/ documents/ICT%20Learning%20Outcomes%20Final.pdf
12. Oyzon, M. V. L. & Olmos, O. L. (2010). Students’ notes and their relation to comprehension and recall of lecture information. Retrieved from http://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/ali/ article/view/1752.
13. Porter, D., Weaver, A. J., & Raptis, H. (2012). Assessing students' learning about fundamental concepts of climate change under two different conditions. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 665-686
14. Şahbaz, N. K. (2012). Evaluation of reading attitudes of 8th grade students in.primary education according to various variables. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(26), 571- 576.
15. Sanacore, J. (2008). Turning reluctant learners into inspired learners. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 82(1), 40-44.
16. software and information industry association. 2000. Research report on the effectiveness of technology in schools. Executive summary http://www.siia.net/sharedcontent/store /e-edtech-sum00.pdf.
17. Volman, M. (2005). A variety of roles for a new type of teacherEducational technology and the teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(1), 15-31.
18. Yoloye, E. O. (2015). New technologies for teaching and learning: Challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. Information communication technology (ICT) integration to educational curricula: A new direction for Africa, 250.
</uk>
<en>
1. Baş, G. (2012). Reading attitudes of high school students: an analysis from different variables. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their implications, 3(2),47-58.
2. Becker, H. (2000). Pedagogical motivations for pupil computer use that lead to student engagement. Educational Technology, 40 (5), pp.5-17.
3. Christensson, P. (2010, January 4). ICT Definition. Retrieved from http://techterms.com.
4. Crook, C. (2011). Versions of computer supported collaborating in higher education. Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices, 156-171.
5. Heemskerk, I., Volman, M., Admiraal, W., & ten Dam, G. (2012). Inclusiveness of ICT in secondary education: students’ appreciation of ICT tools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(2), 155-170.
6. Jung, I. (2005). ICT-Pedagogy Integration in Teacher Training: Application Cases Worldwide. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (2), 94-101.
7. Kirkwood, A. (2014). Teaching and learning with technology in higher education: blended and distance education needs ‘joined-up thinking’rather than technological determinism. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(3), 206-221.
8. Kok, A. (2007). ICT Integration into Classrooms: Unpublished literature review.
9. Kukkonen, J. E., Kärkkäinen, S., Dillon,P., &Keinonen, T. (2013). The effects of scaffolded simulation-based inquiry learning on fifth-Graders' representations of the Greenhouse effect. International Journal of Science Education. Retrieved SEP. 10, 2012，from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.782452
10. Miller, M. (2009). What the Science of Cognition Tells Us About Instructional Technology. Change, 41(2), 16-17. Retrieved from Research Library.
11. OECS. (2002). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Learning Outcomes in Mathematics and Language Arts for Lower Secondary School Students in the Eastern Caribbean. OECS Education Reform Unit. Retrieved from http://www.oecs.org/oeru/ documents/ICT%20Learning%20Outcomes%20Final.pdf
12. Oyzon, M. V. L. & Olmos, O. L. (2010). Students’ notes and their relation to comprehension and recall of lecture information. Retrieved from http://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/ali/ article/view/1752.
13. Porter, D., Weaver, A. J., & Raptis, H. (2012). Assessing students' learning about fundamental concepts of climate change under two different conditions. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 665-686
14. Şahbaz, N. K. (2012). Evaluation of reading attitudes of 8th grade students in.primary education according to various variables. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(26), 571- 576.
15. Sanacore, J. (2008). Turning reluctant learners into inspired learners. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 82(1), 40-44.
16. software and information industry association. 2000. Research report on the effectiveness of technology in schools. Executive summary http://www.siia.net/sharedcontent/store /e-edtech-sum00.pdf.
17. Volman, M. (2005). A variety of roles for a new type of teacherEducational technology and the teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(1), 15-31.
18. Yoloye, E. O. (2015). New technologies for teaching and learning: Challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. Information communication technology (ICT) integration to educational curricula: A new direction for Africa, 250.
</en>
1. Baş, G. (2012). Reading attitudes of high school students: an analysis from different variables. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their implications, 3(2),47-58.
2. Becker, H. (2000). Pedagogical motivations for pupil computer use that lead to student engagement. Educational Technology, 40 (5), pp.5-17.
3. Christensson, P. (2010, January 4). ICT Definition. Retrieved from http://techterms.com.
4. Crook, C. (2011). Versions of computer supported collaborating in higher education. Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices, 156-171.
5. Heemskerk, I., Volman, M., Admiraal, W., & ten Dam, G. (2012). Inclusiveness of ICT in secondary education: students’ appreciation of ICT tools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(2), 155-170.
6. Jung, I. (2005). ICT-Pedagogy Integration in Teacher Training: Application Cases Worldwide. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (2), 94-101.
7. Kirkwood, A. (2014). Teaching and learning with technology in higher education: blended and distance education needs ‘joined-up thinking’rather than technological determinism. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(3), 206-221.
8. Kok, A. (2007). ICT Integration into Classrooms: Unpublished literature review.
9. Kukkonen, J. E., Kärkkäinen, S., Dillon,P., &Keinonen, T. (2013). The effects of scaffolded simulation-based inquiry learning on fifth-Graders' representations of the Greenhouse effect. International Journal of Science Education. Retrieved SEP. 10, 2012，from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.782452
10. Miller, M. (2009). What the Science of Cognition Tells Us About Instructional Technology. Change, 41(2), 16-17. Retrieved from Research Library.
11. OECS. (2002). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Learning Outcomes in Mathematics and Language Arts for Lower Secondary School Students in the Eastern Caribbean. OECS Education Reform Unit. Retrieved from http://www.oecs.org/oeru/ documents/ICT%20Learning%20Outcomes%20Final.pdf
12. Oyzon, M. V. L. & Olmos, O. L. (2010). Students’ notes and their relation to comprehension and recall of lecture information. Retrieved from http://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/ali/ article/view/1752.
13. Porter, D., Weaver, A. J., & Raptis, H. (2012). Assessing students' learning about fundamental concepts of climate change under two different conditions. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 665-686
14. Şahbaz, N. K. (2012). Evaluation of reading attitudes of 8th grade students in.primary education according to various variables. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(26), 571- 576.
15. Sanacore, J. (2008). Turning reluctant learners into inspired learners. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 82(1), 40-44.
16. software and information industry association. 2000. Research report on the effectiveness of technology in schools. Executive summary http://www.siia.net/sharedcontent/store /e-edtech-sum00.pdf.
17. Volman, M. (2005). A variety of roles for a new type of teacherEducational technology and the teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(1), 15-31.
18. Yoloye, E. O. (2015). New technologies for teaching and learning: Challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. Information communication technology (ICT) integration to educational curricula: A new direction for Africa, 250.
</uk>
<en>
1. Baş, G. (2012). Reading attitudes of high school students: an analysis from different variables. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their implications, 3(2),47-58.
2. Becker, H. (2000). Pedagogical motivations for pupil computer use that lead to student engagement. Educational Technology, 40 (5), pp.5-17.
3. Christensson, P. (2010, January 4). ICT Definition. Retrieved from http://techterms.com.
4. Crook, C. (2011). Versions of computer supported collaborating in higher education. Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices, 156-171.
5. Heemskerk, I., Volman, M., Admiraal, W., & ten Dam, G. (2012). Inclusiveness of ICT in secondary education: students’ appreciation of ICT tools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(2), 155-170.
6. Jung, I. (2005). ICT-Pedagogy Integration in Teacher Training: Application Cases Worldwide. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (2), 94-101.
7. Kirkwood, A. (2014). Teaching and learning with technology in higher education: blended and distance education needs ‘joined-up thinking’rather than technological determinism. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(3), 206-221.
8. Kok, A. (2007). ICT Integration into Classrooms: Unpublished literature review.
9. Kukkonen, J. E., Kärkkäinen, S., Dillon,P., &Keinonen, T. (2013). The effects of scaffolded simulation-based inquiry learning on fifth-Graders' representations of the Greenhouse effect. International Journal of Science Education. Retrieved SEP. 10, 2012，from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.782452
10. Miller, M. (2009). What the Science of Cognition Tells Us About Instructional Technology. Change, 41(2), 16-17. Retrieved from Research Library.
11. OECS. (2002). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Learning Outcomes in Mathematics and Language Arts for Lower Secondary School Students in the Eastern Caribbean. OECS Education Reform Unit. Retrieved from http://www.oecs.org/oeru/ documents/ICT%20Learning%20Outcomes%20Final.pdf
12. Oyzon, M. V. L. & Olmos, O. L. (2010). Students’ notes and their relation to comprehension and recall of lecture information. Retrieved from http://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/ali/ article/view/1752.
13. Porter, D., Weaver, A. J., & Raptis, H. (2012). Assessing students' learning about fundamental concepts of climate change under two different conditions. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 665-686
14. Şahbaz, N. K. (2012). Evaluation of reading attitudes of 8th grade students in.primary education according to various variables. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(26), 571- 576.
15. Sanacore, J. (2008). Turning reluctant learners into inspired learners. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 82(1), 40-44.
16. software and information industry association. 2000. Research report on the effectiveness of technology in schools. Executive summary http://www.siia.net/sharedcontent/store /e-edtech-sum00.pdf.
17. Volman, M. (2005). A variety of roles for a new type of teacherEducational technology and the teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(1), 15-31.
18. Yoloye, E. O. (2015). New technologies for teaching and learning: Challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. Information communication technology (ICT) integration to educational curricula: A new direction for Africa, 250.
</en>
Downloads
Published
30.10.2018
How to Cite
Hashmi, Z. F., Dahar, M. A., & Sharif, A. (2018). ROLE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY IN MOTIVATING UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS TOWARDS A LEARNING TASK IN PUBLIC SECTOR UNIVERSITIES OF RAWALPINDI CITY. Journal of Information Technologies in Education (ITE), (36), 007–019. https://doi.org/10.14308/ite000670
Issue
Section
Articles
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
