UNIVERSITY RANKING IMPROVING TOOLS IN MODERN INFORMATION EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

  • M. Bilous Kherson State University, Kherson
Keywords: criteria, ranking, benchmarking, scientometric databases, Webometrics, Scopus, Top-200, SWOT-analysis

Abstract

      Ranking criteria of national and international levels are the instruments of university ranking increasing. Ratings provide a balanced measure of quality in higher educational institutions. Determining the level of university research influences the position of the university in various rankings. We can separate the main aggregates that are considered when ranking international higher education institutions.
     The results of university ranking allows the identification of its strengths and weaknesses in order to develop strategies for success and excellence based on the achievements of other universities at the regional, national and international levels. In article, we can see strengths,weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of Kherson State University (SWOT-analysis).
     The main goals of Kherson State University are self-promotion in the media space, raising the prestige of KSU and integration with the world science community, development of an effective technological corridor: «School - University – Labor» market, increasing the number of students,improving the ranking of academic staff in scientometric databases, and gaining international recognition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References


1. Salmi J. The Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities. / J. Salmi // Washington, DC: The World Bank – 2009 (in Russian)
2. Times Higher Education World University Rankings [online]. - Available from: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings (in English)
3. QS World University Rankings [online]. - Available from: http://www.topuniversities.com /university-rankings (in English)
4. Academic Ranking of World Universities [online]. - Available from: http://www.shanghairanking.com (in English)
5. Ratings “Scopus” [online]. - Available from: http://jsi.net.ua/scopus/ratings_uni
6. Webometrics Ranking of World's Universities [online]. - Available from: http://www.webometrics. info (in English)
7. Ratings “Top 200 Ukraine” [online]. - Available from: http://www.euroosvita.net/index.php /?category=1&id=4068 (in Ukrainian)
8. Spivakovskyі, O.V. University as a corporation which serves educational interests / O.V. Spivakovskyі L.M. Alf'orova, Je.A.Alf'orov // Communications in Computer and Information Science 347 CCIS. – 2013. – pp. 60 (in Ukrainian)
9. Spivakovskyi A. It Asset Management in the context of synchronization other key assets of the University. Monograph. – Kherson:Ajlant, 2012/ - 120s. :il (in Ukrainian)
10. Spivakovskyi O.V. To the problem of ICT management in higher educational institutions / O.V. Spivakovskyi, M.O. Vinnyk, Y.G. Tarasich // Information technology and learning tools №1– 2014. –Volume 39 (in Ukrainian)
11. Spivakovskyi O.V. Experience of information - communication infrastructure KSU on the future level of the leading experts in the field of IT / O.V. Spivakovskyi, L.M. Alf'orova, Je.A.Alf'orov // Komp’juter u shkoli ta sim’ji . -2012. - №5. – S.13-15. (in Ukrainian)
12. Petuhova, L.E., Spivakovsky, O.V.: The main problems of modern higher education didactics. Computer in school and family. – 2011 - vol. 3 (91), pp .13-15 (in Ukrainian).
Published
2015-11-28
Pages
090-099
How to Cite
BilousM. (2015). UNIVERSITY RANKING IMPROVING TOOLS IN MODERN INFORMATION EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT . Journal of Information Technologies in Education (ITE), (23), 090-099. https://doi.org/10.14308/ite000539