HYBRID COGNITIVE SYSTEM IN THE INTERACTION OF HUMAN, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ENVIRONMENT

Authors

  • Liubov Petukhova
  • Oleksandra Pospielova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14308/ite000809

Keywords:

hybrid cognition, tri-subject didactics, cognitive ecosystem, digital twins, cognitive emergence, generative AI, cognitive extender, adaptive learning, cognitive synergy

Abstract

The study provides a theoretical and methodological analysis of the prerequisites and mechanisms for the formation of a hybrid cognitive system resulting from the interaction of three interrelated agents: humans, artificial intelligence, and the socio-technical environment. It is
substantiated that the spread of generative artificial intelligence transforms its functional status from an instrumental means to an autonomous cognitive agent capable of influencing the structure, dynamics, and logic of cognitive processes. This transformation necessitates a revision of traditional approaches to understanding the nature of cognition and the mechanisms of organizing educational activities and actualizes the conceptualization of hybrid consciousness as an emergent phenomenon formed in conditions of biosociotechnical interaction. The theoretical basis of the study is the provisions of distributed learning theory and the biosociotechnical model, which interpret thinking as a dynamic, networked, and ecologically embedded system. In this context, modern digital technologies, in particular generative AI, are considered as cognitive extenders capable of expanding the boundaries of individual cognition by supporting analytical, simulative, and prognostic processes. Within the framework of tri-subject didactics, artificial intelligence is defined as a full-fledged subject of educational interaction that participates in the formation of individualized learning trajectories, adaptive content selection, and cognitive support for the learner. A special place in the structure of the hybrid cognitive system is given to the concept of digital twins, which are interpreted as dynamic models capable of reproducing and predicting the state and behavior of key educational agents. Three types of digital twins are distinguished—the student, the teacher, and the university infrastructure environment—which function as part of a single cognitive circuit. Their interaction ensures the cyclical nature of information and analytical processes, which include sensory data collection, cognitive-analytical processing, adaptive formation of pedagogical decisions, and reflective updating of cognitive models. The algorithmic structure of the cognitive cycle of a hybrid system is outlined, which includes sensory, analytical, integrative, and reflective modules that function as coordinated elements of a single socio-technical ecosystem. It is shown that in such a system, cognitive processes acquire a distributed, polycentric, and networked character, in which human intentionality, algorithmic information processing, and socio-technical contexts emerge as complementary determinants of the thinking process and learning activity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boland, R. J., Jr., Tenkasi, R. V., & Teeni, D. (1994). Designing information technology to support distributed cognition. Organization Science, 5(3), 456–475. https://lnk.ua/AVMmEyPVo

Card, A. J. (2022). The biopsychosociotechnical model: a systems-based framework for human-centered health improvement. Health Systems (Basingstoke), 12(4), 387–407. https://lnk.ua/R4aMWRA4J

Digital-Twin Technology and Higher Ed. Explainer. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://lnk.ua/1V9kzMK4g

Distributed Cognition. (n.d.). The decision lab. Retrieved from https://lnk.ua/k4x97bQey

Furniss, D., Garfield, S., Husson, F., Blandford, A., & Franklin, B. D. (2019). Distributed Cognition: Understanding Complex Sociotechnical Informatics. In P. Scott et al. (Eds.), Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics (doi:10.3233/SHTI190113). Retrieved from https://lnk.ua/AVMmEyyVo

Gerlich, M. (2025). AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6. https://lnk.ua/MVwoWG8Vz

Kohnityvna systema [Cognitive system]. (n.d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved fromhttps://lnk.ua/YNg5BbkeZ

Lumen Partners. (2025, September 26). The fabric of agency: Philosophical insights for agentic AI. Lumen Partners Blog. https://lnk.ua/MNjpJxGeE

Maksymenko, S. D., & Pasichnyk, I. D. (2012). Kohnityvna psykholohiia v konteksti doslidzhennia pam’iati liudyny [Cognitive psychology in the context of human memory research]. Naukovi zapysky. Seriia «Psykholohiia i pedahohika», № 20. Retrieved from https://lnk.ua/zN2K3ba47

Petukhova, L. Ye. (2014). Trysub’iektna dydaktyka v modeli innovatsiinoho rozvytku osvitnikh system [Three-subject didactics in the model of innovative development of educational systems]. Pedahohichni nauky : zb. nauk. prats, Vypusk 65, 74–80. Retrieved from https://lnk.ua/R4aMWRY4J

Piredda, G. (2017). The Mark of the Cognitive and the Coupling-Constitution Fallacy: A Defense of the Extended Mind Hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2061. https://lnk.ua/1V9kzMx4g

Rubanets, O. (2015). Kohnityvna aktyvnist osobystosti [Cognitive activity of the individual]. Multyversum. Filosofskyi almanakh, 9–10(99–107). Retrieved from https://lnk.ua/aVp9WBjND

Singh, A., Taneja, K., Guan, Z., & Ghosh, A. (2025). Protecting Human Cognition in the Age of AI. Retrieved from https://lnk.ua/Men0jbQNg

What is a cognitive AI agent? (n.d.). Milvus. Retrieved from https://lnk.ua/x4LXMv94n

Published

13.07.2026

How to Cite

Petukhova Л. Є., & Pospielova О. О. (2026). HYBRID COGNITIVE SYSTEM IN THE INTERACTION OF HUMAN, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ENVIRONMENT. Journal of Information Technologies in Education (ITE), (59), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.14308/ite000809